Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice issue.

Data differ drastically on the number of medical mistakes that occur in the United States. Some research studies put the number of medical errors in excess of one million yearly while other studies put the number as low as a couple of hundred thousand. It is commonly accepted nevertheless that iatrogenic illness (disease or injury brought on by a medical error or medical treatment) is the third leading cause of death in the United States after heart disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As an attorney who has actually limited his practice to representation of victims injured by another person's neglect, medical or otherwise, I have received thousands of calls from potential clients over the last Twenty Years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Because medical malpractice litigation is extremely costly and really protracted the attorneys in our firm are extremely cautious exactly what medical malpractice cases in which we opt to get included. It is not uncommon for a lawyer, or law practice to advance lawsuits expenses in excess of $100,000.00 just to get a case to trial. These expenses are the costs connected with pursuing the lawsuits that include expert witness fees, deposition expenses, exhibit preparation and court expenses. What follows is a summary of the concerns, concerns and factors to consider that the attorneys in our firm think about when discussing with a client a prospective medical malpractice case.

Exactly What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Requirement of Care" for medical doctors (or nurses, chiropractic physicians, dental professionals, podiatric doctors and so on.) which results in an injury or death. "Requirement of Care" means medical treatment that an affordable, sensible medical supplier in the same neighborhood should supply. Many cases include a disagreement over what the appropriate requirement of care is. The standard of care is generally provided through the use of expert testament from consulting medical professionals that practice or teach medicine in the same specialized as the offender( s).

When did the malpractice happen (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of constraints is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the offender dealt with the plaintiff (victim) or the date the plaintiff found or fairly must have found the malpractice. Some states have a two year statute of constraints. In Ohio if the victim is a small the statute of restrictions will not even start to run till the minor ends up being 18 years of ages. Be advised however derivative claims for parents might run many years previously. If you believe you may have a case it is very important you contact an attorney soon. Irrespective of the statute of constraints, medical professionals transfer, witnesses vanish and memories fade. The quicker counsel is engaged the sooner essential proof can be maintained and the better your opportunities are of prevailing.

What did the physician do or cannot do?

Just due to the fact that a patient does not have an effective arise from a surgical treatment, medical procedure or medical treatment does not in and of itself indicate the physician made a mistake. Medical practice is by no indicates a guarantee of good health or a complete recovery. Most of the time when a patient experiences a not successful result from medical treatment it is not because the medical provider slipped up. The majority of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is in spite of good, quality treatment not because of sub-standard healthcare.

3 Questions to Ask Your Lawyer - FOX10 News - WALA

Choosing a lawyer to handle your case can seem like an overwhelming task, and of course you want to makes sure you’ve chosen the right one. Attorney David Greene from Greene & Phillips Law Firm joined us on Studio10 to explain the three most important questions you should ask your personal injury lawyer before you hire them.The following questions and answers below were provided by Greene & Phillips: 3 Questions to Ask Your Lawyer - FOX10 News - WALA

When going over a potential case with a client it is very important that the client have the ability to tell us why they believe there was medical negligence. As we all know people often die from cancer, cardiovascular disease or organ failure even with excellent medical care. However, we also understand that individuals usually must not pass away from knee surgery, appendix elimination, hernia repair or some other "small" surgery. When something extremely unforeseen like that occurs it definitely deserves checking out whether there was a medical error. If in doubt most medical malpractice lawyers will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. Most legal representatives do not charge for an initial consultation in negligence cases.

So what if there was a medical error (near cause)?

In any negligence case not just is the burden of proof on the plaintiff to show the medical malpractice the complainant should likewise show that as a direct result of the medical carelessness some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "near cause." Because medical malpractice lawsuits is so costly to pursue the injuries should be considerable to necessitate moving on with the case. All medical errors are "malpractice" nevertheless only a little portion of errors generate medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his kid to the emergency room after a skateboard accident and the ER medical professional does not do x-rays in spite of an obvious bend in the child's lower arm and informs the father his kid has "just a sprain" this likely is medical malpractice. But, if the child is appropriately diagnosed within a couple of days and makes a complete healing it is not likely the "damages" are extreme sufficient to undertake a claim that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. Nevertheless, if because of -up in being effectively identified, the kid has to have his arm re-broken and the growth plate is irreparably damaged due to the delay then the damages likely would require more investigation and a possible claim.

Other crucial factors to consider.

Other issues that are very important when identifying whether a customer has a malpractice case consist of the victim's habits and case history. Did the victim do anything to trigger or contribute to the bad medical result? A typical method of medical malpractice defense lawyer is to blame the patient. If it is a birth injury case, did the mom have proper prenatal care, did she smoke or utilize drugs during her pregnancy? In other cases, did the client follow the doctor's orders, keep his appointments, take his medicine as instructed and inform the physician the fact? These are truths that we need to understand in order to determine whether the physician will have a legitimate defense to the malpractice claim?

What occurs if it appears like there is a case?

If appears that the patient might have been a victim of a medical error, the medical error caused a considerable injury or death and the client was compliant with his physician's orders, then we have to get the patient's medical records. In most cases, obtaining the medical records includes absolutely nothing more mailing a release signed by the client to the medical professional and/or healthcare facility in addition to a letter asking for the records. In of wrongful death, an administrator of the victims estate has to be designated in the local county court of probate then the executor can sign the release asking for the records.

Once the records are received we review them to make sure they are complete. It is not unusual in medical carelessness cases to receive insufficient medical charts. As soon as all the relevant records are acquired they are provided to a competent medical professional for review and viewpoint. If the case is against an emergency room doctor we have an emergency room doctor review the case, if it's against a cardiologist we need to get a viewpoint from a cardiologist, and so on

. Mostly, exactly what we wish to know form the specialist is 1) was the medical care offered below the requirement of care, 2) did the violation of the standard of care lead to the clients injury or death? If the physicians opinion is favorable on both counts a lawsuit will be prepared on the client's behalf and typically submitted in the court of typical pleas in the county where the malpractice was committed or in the county where the defendant lives. In some minimal situations jurisdiction for the malpractice suit could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, a good malpractice lawyer will carefully and completely examine any potential malpractice case prior to submitting a suit. It's unfair to the victim or the doctors to submit a claim unless the specialist informs us that he thinks there is a strong basis to bring the suit. Due to the cost of pursuing a medical neglect action no good lawyer has the time or resources to squander on a "frivolous claim."

When seeking advice from a malpractice legal representative it's important to precisely give the lawyer as much detail as possible and answer the attorney's concerns as entirely as possible. Prior to talking with think about making some notes so you remember some crucial reality or scenario the attorney may require.

Lastly, if you believe you might have a malpractice case contact an excellent malpractice lawyer as soon as possible so there are no statute of restrictions issues in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *